Asia, America, and the Transformation of Geopolitics

Portada
Cambridge University Press, 2007 M11 5
American security and prosperity now depend on Asia. William H. Overholt offers an iconoclastic analysis of developments in each major Asian country, Asian international relations, and US foreign policy. Drawing on decades of political and business experience, he argues that obsolete Cold War attitudes tie the US increasingly to an otherwise isolated Japan and obscure the reality that a US-Chinese bicondominium now manages most Asian issues. Military priorities risk polarizing the region unnecessarily, weaken the economic relationships that engendered American preeminence, and ironically enhance Chinese influence. As a result, US influence in Asia is declining. Overholt disputes the argument that democracy promotion will lead to superior development and peace, and forecasts a new era in which Asian geopolitics could take a drastically different shape. Covering Japan, China, Russia, Central Asia, India, Pakistan, Korea, and South-East Asia, Overholt offers invaluable insights for scholars, policy-makers, business people, and general readers.
 

Contenido

CHAPTER
1
CHAPTER
11
PostCold War Developments and Architectural Changes
27
CHAPTER THREE
33
Regional Trends
39
The New Phase of the Asian Economic Miracle
48
CHAPTER FOUR
63
PostBust Foreign Policy
76
CHAPTER EIGHT
223
Cold War Images and PostCold War Policy Anomalies
230
01_MG491fm indd01_MG491fm indd viivii
235
The Perils of Dominant Military Priorities
238
The Need for an Attitude Transplant
261
Cold War II
270
U S Disengagement
278
Crisis of Globalization
287

CHAPTER FIVE
139
Korea
154
Southeast Asia
169
CHAPTER
187
Russia and China 214
196

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Pasajes populares

Página xv - We shall provide a shield if a nuclear power threatens the freedom of a nation allied with us, or of a nation whose survival we consider vital to our security and the security of the region as a whole.
Página xiii - Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own, to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?
Página xiii - It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world...
Página xv - Third, in cases involving other types of aggression, we shall furnish military and economic assistance when requested in accordance with our treaty commitments. But we shall look to the nation directly threatened to assume the primary responsibility of providing the manpower for its defense.
Página xvi - The Japanese were the most alien enemy the United States had ever fought in an allout struggle. In no other war with a major foe had it been necessary to take into account such exceedingly different habits of acting and thinking.
Página xvi - Russia before us in 1905, we were fighting a nation fully armed and trained which did not belong to the Western cultural tradition. Conventions of war which Western nations had come to accept as facts of human nature obviously did not exist for the Japanese.

Acerca del autor (2007)

William H. Overholt holds the Asia Policy Research Chair at RAND's California headquarters and is Director of the Center. Dr Overholt was previously Joint Senior Fellow at Harvard University. After eight years at a think tank consulting on national security issues, he ran investment bank research teams, mainly in Asia, from 1980 to 2001 and served as a consultant to several major political figures in Asia. He is the author of six books, including The Rise of China (1993), which won the Mainichi News/Asian Affairs Research Center Special Book Prize.

Información bibliográfica